Charles Broom vs Kyle Seelig Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Broom vs K. Seelig

Charles Broom
GBR
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
28
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
5'9" (175 cm)
333
C. Rank
886
235
Best Rank
349
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$40.0K
Career Money
$4.1K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Kyle Seelig
USA
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
28
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
5'9" (175 cm)
333
C. Rank
886
235
Best Rank
349
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$40.0K
Career Money
$4.1K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Broom 1 - 0 Seelig
They have played 2 sets in total, with Charles Broom winning 2 and Kyle Seelig winning 0. The last match between Charles Broom and Kyle Seelig was at the M15 Heraklion, 05-12-2021, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Charles Broom getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Broom | 1 |
| Seelig | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) M15 Heraklion(12-05-21)
Charles Broom
6
6
Kyle Seelig
3
3
C. Broom vs K. Seelig H2H Profile
C. Broom vs K. Seelig Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Charles Broom has won 43.60% of points on their second serve, while Kyle Seelig has won 46.70%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Charles Broom, in recent form, has won 44.71% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kyle Seelig has won 47.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.78% and 24.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Charles Broom has saved 52.20% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kyle Seelig has saved 50.00% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Charles Broom has won 62.71% of matches played (W/L 37/22), with Kyle Seelig winning 10.00% (W/L 1/9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Charles Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 25/22). Kyle Seelig has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 91/51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 13/15).
- Player level: In the last year, Charles Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 79.41% of matches (W/L 27/7), where as Kyle Seelig has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 14.29% of matches (W/L 1/6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Charles Broom winning 1 times and Kyle Seelig being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Charles Broom winning 2 and Kyle Seelig winning 0.
- The last match between Charles Broom and Kyle Seelig was at the M15 Heraklion, 05-12-2021, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Charles Broom getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:35:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Charles Broom has played against opponents with an average rank of 339.97 while Kyle Seelig has played against players with an average rank of 229.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Charles Broom has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kyle Seelig has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Charles Broom has converted 34.27% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kyle Seelig has converted 26.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Charles Broom vs Kyle Seelig Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Broom vs K. Seelig H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:35:0 | Average Match Time | 1:35:0 |
| 63% (35/56) | 1st Serve % | 60% (41/68) |
| 74% (26/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (22/41) |
| 62% (13/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (12/27) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 50% (34/68) | Return Points Win % | 30% (17/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Broom 54%, Seelig 47%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Broom 55%, Seelig 48%.
Break Points Saved %: Broom 61%, Seelig 50%.
C. Broom Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 6-3 1-6 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 1-6 7-6(4) | ||
K. Seelig Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 7-6(3) | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||

C. Broom vs K. Seelig Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.03% (263/161) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.54% (144/90) |
| 59.50% (592/403) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.62% (313/212) |
| 53.96% (5067/4324) | Games Win/Loss | 54.37% (2602/2184) |
| 65.99% (130/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.08% (91/51) |
| 66.67% (44/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.50% (40/24) |
| 56.14% (64/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46.43% (13/15) |
| 53.19% (25/22) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1782 | Aces Total | 158 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1043 | Total Double Faults | 295 |
| 1:28:8 | Average Match Time | 1:16:42 |
| 384.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 401.7 |
| 62% (15349/24711) | 1st Serve % | 70% (8148/11718) |
| 70% (10745/15349) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (5161/8148) |
| 51% (4729/9361) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1853/3569) |
| 41% (1116/2700) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (616/1313) |
| 41% (10743/26234) | Return Points Win % | 43% (5060/11864) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 45.38% (54/65) | Challenger W/L | 29.63% (8/19) |
| 69.93% (207/89) | Futures W/L | 66.18% (135/69) |
| 62% (261/421) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (140/229) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 52% (72/138) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (25/51) |
| 54% (79/146) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (32/60) |
| 87% (251/218) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (142/124) |
| 13% (251/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (142/17) |
| 26% (173/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (92/19) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Fri, 21 Nov, 09:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 08:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 06:30 PM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 05:00 AM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 05:05 PM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 01:10 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Bergamo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mark Lajal vs Justin Engel Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Jaume Antoni Munar Clar vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →LP Open by IND – Colina Preview And Prediction: Laura Pigossi vs Leolia Jeanjean Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025
Top Predictions Today
04:10
H2H 1-1
20:00
H2H 0-1
17:00
H2H 0-0
18:30
H2H 0-0
18:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal